Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Flop 4th Birthday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedied per A7 '. Tawker (talk) 02:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Flop 4th Birthday[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any evidence in reliable sources that this rap battle was a notable event. As such, it fails the General Notability Guide. — sparklism ^hey! 15:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - appears to fail WP:GNG/ WP:EVENTCRIT. Not finding any coverage about this event in reliable sources. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete A7 This is a pre-organised event which makes no credible claim to significance; there are no sources so the content is un-verifiable and as there is no mention as to any lasting significance so fails the Wikipedia is not a newspaper "enduring notability of persons and events" policy test. LGA _talk^edits 09:10, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've speedied it. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:48, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.