Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic Haddock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 13:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Haddock[edit]

Dominic Haddock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are wholly inadequate for WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Theatre, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 13:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Coverage in various playbills (the thing they give you at a performance) and at fundraising events, I don't find much else beyond those. Oaktree b (talk) 15:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No significant coverage cited. Whoever put up this "article" should be embarrassed. Delete, and if this person is or ever becomes notable, then someone can write a real encyclopedia entry about him. -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG for lack of independent and reliable sources. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 19:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.