Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic Durden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Durden[edit]

Dominic Durden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. His death was used as a political prop by a certain political candidate. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:08, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:08, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please also consider whether this could be merged / redirected into another article per WP:ATD and WP:BIO1E
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 21:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Yes, this individual has received some media coverage, but all of it is about this death, and the means thereof: I do not therefore believe that this demonstrates notability, at the scale that it is. Of course, beyond a certain point even that sort of coverage must grant notability (eg Trayvon Martin) but I do not think this rises to anywhere near that level: we are looking at less than a 100 sources. Vanamonde (talk) 09:36, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and others. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 16:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.