Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domaine Ylang Ylang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Domaine Ylang Ylang[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, closed distillery with no WP:RS on page, none that I could find, and none are likely to exist. Cabrils (talk) 21:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Mauritius. Shellwood (talk) 21:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On the assumption we all actually know what Ylang Ylang actually is, I would like to confirm that this subject has nothing to do with food and drink!!!! This domaine is historically probably the oldest Ylang Ylang (NOT food) distillery and perhaps the oldest of all in terms of essential oils and perfumes. So your understanding, patience and encouragement are the order of the day. I am putting on record some of the history of Mauritius where precious little or no recording of history occurs, as the island gets more and more commercialised. So do not delete it before you do research on and/ or know Mauritius and its past and culture. Stockbroker369 (talk) 06:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems to be a tourist attraction, but not enough source material to build an article. There are a number of articles relating to the owner being convicted of a killing in 2006 but I didn't see any real discussion of the business. I added one cite; if others find more I'll reconsider my vote. Oblivy (talk) 08:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion as there is are comments that are clearly an unbolded Keep here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I was able to find an additional paragraph of coverage in a Spanish-language travel book [1], and got Google Books hits on an additional book and a magazine article whose previews are not rendering for me ([2], [3]. I'd be willing to guess that additional coverage exists in undigitized travel guides. It also pops up in Google Scholar results for fly species discoveries, which is another potential source of offline coverage. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Specific analysis of sources known to be available would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.