Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dolores Chaplin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The actress may well be notable based on the cited coverage, but right now we have a completely unsourced contested WP:BLP, which makes deletion mandatory under our current application of that policy. Can be userfied and, once sourced, restored. Sandstein 05:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dolores Chaplin[edit]
- Dolores Chaplin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete as non-notable. No claim to notability at all except for surname. [email protected] (talk) 12:58, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. List of credits appears sufficient to satisfy WP:ENT, and even a cursory GNews search turns up NYTimes coverage, including a miniprofile and a film review [1] [2]; plus lots of non-English language coverage. Lousy article, but the fact that its author cared only about family ties doesn't mean she's not otherwise notable. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:11, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - Just because someone is a progeny of someone notable does not make you notable. There is also a threshold of notability required. This threshold is not met here. DeusImperator (talk) 18:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete When googled she has no notable achievements. Also, just because someone has famous family members that does not make them famous themselves. --Rvanwinkle1 (talk) 23:20, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Below is some of the significant coverge she has. Some are primarily her talking about herself but enough are not. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ansermoz, Claude (25 June 2011), "Dolores Chaplin croque", 24 Heures (in French)
- "Dolores Chaplin: son nom, sa vie et Astérix!", La Tribune de Genève (in French), 6 May 2011
- Aust, Bettina (25 March 2007), "Dolores Chaplin - "Ich glaube an ein Happy End"", Welt am Sonntag (in German)
- "The importance of being Chaplin", Hindustan Times, 29 November 2005
- Souperbie, Bastien (28 December 2007), "Dolores Chaplin: son nom, sa vie et Astérix!", Sud Ouest (in French)
- Barron, James (25 November 1999), "A Quick Talker, Unlike Grandfather", The New York Times
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hidden categories: