Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dollie Grissam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Downs syndrome. Amended to delete per policy considerations. MBisanz talk 01:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dollie Grissam[edit]

Dollie Grissam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability. A person who is "possibly the oldest person with x" does not warrant an article for that reason unless it's picked up on by medical academics or more serious publications than those cited in this article. Josh Milburn (talk) 14:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The claim of being the oldest Downie was made by the nursing home where she lived, an utterly unreliable source. WWGB (talk) 10:23, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Downs syndrome. Maybe deserves a mention there, but not warranting an individual article. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 19:10, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete If this "possible" oldest record was actually notable, we would have better than find a grave (not at all reliable), an article from the paper in the town she lived in and a feel good article from a TV station in the state she lived in. There are just not enough sources to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.