Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dollface

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:16, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dollface[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet the relevant notability guidelines. (Please note this is regarding the 2015 film - there are others with an identical name) Exemplo347 (talk) 23:03, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Indeed, as written doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG and I don't see anything else (reviews, etc.). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 23:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Minimal information, topic not notable. Jeff Quinn (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The horrorfreaknews.com article is a long and detailed review from what looks like a reliable source. No other significant coverage found by independent reliable sources. One review doesn't satisfy WP:NFILM. Also missed WP:N. Gab4gab (talk) 16:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.