Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogwood Lane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dogwood Lane[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor street in a small town, with no properly sourced indication of notability. Was previously prodded, but prod tag was removed. Subsequent edits provided a couple of references which confirmed the street's existence (namely Google Maps and a local real estate directory), but still nothing which actually demonstrated that it belongs in an encyclopedia. I still don't see how this is anything but a delete, really. Bearcat (talk) 04:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to be "just another street" with no established encyclopedic notability whatsoever. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable and unencyclopedic. Imzadi 1979 → 02:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Minor street (very minor if there's only 25 properties on it), nothing notable about it. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 05:01, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Keristrasza (talk) 15:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with 25 properties on it in two blocks, the street is clearly NN. Nothing worth merging with a locality. No doubt the article creator lives there. Peterkingiron (talk) 00:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't get why it would have to be deleted, it's not like Wikipedia's not allowed to have streets, even if minor, and doesn't have a page limit. This isn't the first time someone's deleted an article of mine for a stupid reason - so congrats, you lost an editor :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.126.111 (talk) 01:13, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sounds so much like your common, everyday street in every little town. Nothing that makes it belong in an encyclopedia. I am saying this as a Pennsylvania resident myself. Within a square mile of where I live, there are probably dozens of streets you can say basically the same things about if you were to write an article. This is not a main thoroughfare, not a place where any famous buildings are located, and there is no notable history here. Dew Kane (talk) 23:19, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.