Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogu Abaris

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dogu Abaris[edit]

Dogu Abaris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Abaris is a visual effects professional. He needs to pass GNG to justify the article. At present we have an IMDb listing and another listing which as far as I can tell is a Turkish language site somewhat similar. Neither are reliable sources, especially not from the standpoint of showing the person is notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - he's worked on several major films, but it's unclear how important his contribution has been. An expert's input would be helpful. Bearian (talk) 19:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'm not the expert called for but I cannot see how he passes WP:BIO as there are literally hundreds of people that work on the films quoted and this does not make them notable in any sense. Paste Let’s have a chat. 13:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 23:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.