Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogo Sardo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pastore Fonnese. Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:29, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dogo Sardo[edit]

Dogo Sardo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG SagaciousPhil - Chat 09:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support, unable to find sources even using alternate names such as 'dogo sardesco' --TKK! bark with me! 10:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am not going to vote, but I did heard of this dog - breed, here and there, Like [1] here [2] and like [3][4]

. and also from a Sardinian friend. Pictures Looks like they have some things in common, no? Dgwallpapers.net Dogo sardesco The little brother of the Cane Corso, [5] living in Corsica, the next island. Why not ask someone om the Sardinia project. Hafspajen (talk) 15:41, 14 January 2014 (UTC) Looks like it has an article on Italian Wiki -> https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogo_sardo, Italian refMore ref in ITalian[6][reply]

Comment - Unfortunately, the article on the Italian Wikipedia does not include any references. One of the links you've given is the only ref already included in the article - the others seem to be forums or unreliable sources. SagaciousPhil - Chat 17:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Unfortunately, it is a rare breed, so nothing on AKC or FCI. This is what we have, [7] and I hope this will be

OK: [8] Hafspajen (talk) 22:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC) And a lot of Italian newspaper articles on the dog. And I do read Italian even if I speak not so well. Hafspajen (talk) 22:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion; the page should probably be a redirect to Pastore Fonnese for now. The breed (or type, since there's nothing to say it's a breed) gets some mentions. It was one of four indigenous Sardinian dogs present at a raduno (a sort of meeting of dog owners, not a show or a trial) at Scano Montiferro. It has a listing on agraria.org, a site that is often quite reliable. However that listing is written by the same person who organised the raduno, so can hardly be regarded as independent confirmation. The newspaper clippings in the YouTube video posted by Hafspajen indeed confirm that the Italian army used Sardinian dogs; however the dogs are described as being the heavy breed of Fonni (i.e., the Fonnese) or light dogs from Ogliastra. Neither of those is the Dogo Sardo, nor did I see the word "dogo" anywhere in those clippings. Until and unless the Regione Sardegna takes an interest in establishing whether or not this is a breed really distinct from the Fonnese, I find it hard to justify an independent article. It is disappearingly unlikely that it will get ENCI recognition unless the region takes the first step. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 09:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I agree with Justlettersandnumbers, it should be redirected to Pastore Fonnese for now. Afro-Eurasian (talk) 01:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.