Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog Watch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dog Watch[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. Found nothing in a WP:BEFORE search and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 17:16, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What was I thinking here?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:16, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the only mentions I can see are from television showings in tv guides (also it seems the creator Vchimpanzee, as above, questions its existence now too?) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:25, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 01:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No RS, and article creator seems to be re-considering! Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NFO .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.