Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dodoria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep Naconkantari 02:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dodoria[edit]

Dodoria is a minor character, he should be merged into list of other aliens in Dragon Ball. -- User:General Cui 00:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No he's not. First you vandalize the article because you don't like the character, and then when your vandalism is reverted, you put the article up for deletion? You have NO basis for doing this, and are making a nomination based on personal feelings rather than because it's appropriate. If Dodoria is a minor character, then so is Zarbon. Both only appear in a few (read: many) episodes, after all, as well as an hour long TV special that reveals a lot of background information about the Saiyajin, and Goku's father. And it's not like Dodoria had a major role in any of tha--Oh wait! He DID.

Nomination is invalid. Don't use your dislike of characters to try to change Wikipedia for the worse.

Daishokaioshin 02:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1.I dont dislike him. 2.He does not deserve an entire page, all of this can be easily covered in other articles. 3.I dont see how he played a big role? Please enlighten me. -- User:General Cui 03:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete minor character. 24.3.28.181 03:17, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This anonymous user is probably User:General Cui. See [1] [2]. (An admin can confirm easily enough.) As anon users are not given as much weight (see WP:AFD), this is likely moot, but may demonstrate bad faith on the part of the submitter. JRP 03:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete useless article. Frieza-Bomber 03:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Please see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Frieza-Bomber. This user may be either a sockpuppet / puppetmaster of User:General Cui. If the outcome of that investigation is positive, this vote (and possibly the whole AFD) should be discarded as bad faith. JRP 04:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1. If you don't dislike him, then why did you vandalize the article?

2. Your opinion of what is deserving of having an article is noted, but irrelevant. A lot of things could easily be covered in other articles. The question isn't whether they can, but whether it is appropriate. In this case, the character has enough screen time and material to have an informative article written about them, which would be diminished greatly by deleting the article and putting a short blurb somewhere else.

3. He killed off Burdock's entire team, and nearly killed him as well. He was one of Freeza's two (that's right. Two. Kiwi was an incredibly trivial "character") top henchmen, killed Namekians while gathering the Dragon Balls for Freeza, and was nearly the end of Kuririn and Gohan. He might not be AS significant as someone like Freeza, but he appears in more than a couple episodes like Kiwi.

4. "minor character" as a comment summary isn't sufficient. Provide your reasoning for why Dodoria is minor.

5. Oh, I see. The Dodoria article is useless. It has absolutely no value whatsoever. And all of your vandalism and reverts and adding of pointless text is SO much less useless, right, "Frieza"-Bomber? Describe in what way the Dodoria article is "useless", rather than just trying to stack votes.

Oppose the deletion. Daishokaioshin 03:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why the hell does "General Cui" care. If he doesn't like Dodoria and doesn't believe that he merits attention, then he doesn't have to read about him. Why debate whether or not he deserves a page. Why not just enjoy the fact that someone took the time to put as much information about all of the Dragonball Z characters as they could for the enjoyment of others. Get over it. —the preceding comment is by 69.137.238.215 (talk • contribs) 69.137.238.215: Please sign your posts!.[3] 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Speedy Keep AFD was made in bad faith, by a sock puppet, with the only "delete" votes coming from that user and his anon IP address account. JRP 12:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep per JRP -Toptomcat 15:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Toxinxc 17:13, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep bad faith nomination made by vandal. All delete votes are from sock-puppets Wavy G 02:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep bad faith/vandal nomination. SkierRMH 02:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.