Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitry Shkarin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitry Shkarin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks RS indicating that he is personally notable, rather than works being notable. Swil999 (talk) 18:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Swil999 (talk) 18:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Swil999 (talk) 18:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Swil999 (talk) 18:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:55, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no sources are showing that this person would pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:22, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, he has some passing mentions in primary programming sources, but there simply is no coverage of him to be found in RS, neither in English nor Russian – Thjarkur (talk) 11:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject does appear to be notable but it needs more sources otherwise it is to be deleted.--Blurz (talk) 00:59, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.