Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitry Mitrohin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Propper translliteration can be decided elsewhere Monty ₈₄₅ 20:23, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitry Mitrohin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG ColonelHenry (talk) 08:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep - You must be kidding, Colonel. - Altenmann >t 08:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- P.S. Actually, this may be my mistake. His name in genuine English publication of early last century was spelled "Mitrohin", so I assumed it must be used as title. HOwever google search shows much more relevant sources with "Mitrokhin" spellings, so assuming good faith, you must have been fooled by google (with my help). - Altenmann >t 08:15, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep but move to Dmitry Mitrokhin which seems to be the preferred translliteration. There is at least one book on his work (presumably published in Russian) and there is plenty of side reference to his importance especially WRT Arthur Ransome. Mangoe (talk) 13:27, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - needs a lot of work, see here: [1]...Modernist (talk) 11:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.