Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Djay Malyk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. per G5: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saqlainify Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 18:35, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Djay Malyk[edit]

Djay Malyk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline A7 eligible article for a non notable musician who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence falls short of WP:GNG & doesn’t satisfy any criterion from WP:MUSICBIO. All sources used in the article appear to be unreliable, at lest two-third of the sources used in the article are links to sites where anyone can upload their music such Amazon, iTunes, Discogs & the lot of such unreliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 21:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment See previous the AFDs, creation, move, deletion, and edit filter logs of of similar-named pages:
If the current content is substantially similar to any content deleted at AFD, G4 speedy delete as a re-creation. If it's not substantially similar, please say that you checked and it's G4-ineligible. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and SALT - zero evidence of notability and page has been continually recreated Spiderone 09:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Article consists purely of junk sites like facebook, discogs, itunes, lastfm, resident advisor and ticket sites. No evidence of notability. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 09:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment An editor has created a new draft on this topic. Although the editor did not submit it under articles for creation I summarily reviewed and rejected the draft. The reason for the rejection is There is already a page at Djay Malyk. That page is the subject of this deletion discussion. If that discussion results in "deletion" that is a sign that this topic is NOT suitable for an article in Wikipedia and no further drafts about this person should be made until the issues raised in that discussion are addressed. On the other hand, if the discussion results in "keep" or "no consensus to delete" then this draft should be rejected as redundant. Either way, I am rejecting it. I added another note, Note to other AFC reviewers considering allowing a new page to be created on this topic: Pages have been created numerous times on this topic. Most have been "speedy deleted" for one reason or another. Please see the AFD discussion for a list.
davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.