Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diwa de Leon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Diwa de Leon[edit]

Article fails WP:Notability. User234 (talk) 08:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:Notability and WP:COI. - User234 (talk) 04:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep COI aside, the article now belongs to Wiki. Multiple refs/sources indicate easy passage of WP:CREATIVE through WP:GNG, even if Philipino. Notability is notability. Its now a matter of WP:CLEANUP, not deletion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most of the references seem to come from Diwa's own blog so I tend to think he fails the notability guideline. Though I will say he plays the violin very well.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 18:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party sources. JamesBurns (talk) 06:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.