Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Division of Animation and Digital Arts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to USC School of Cinematic Arts. Black Kite (talk) 18:28, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Division of Animation and Digital Arts[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Much as I'd hate to get rid of this (as I'm technically a part of this program), I can't find evidence of notability for it. All sources in the article are primary, a basic Google search comes up with nothing outside of USC material, and a GNews search comes up with only passing mentions (e.g. "Kathy Smith, the head of the John C. Hench Division of Animation and Digital Arts" type mentions). Redirect to the broader USC School of Cinematic Arts is possible, but the current title isn't IMO specific enough to point directly to USC, so that should really only be done if a merge is decided on. Ansh6 6 6 20:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 12:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as suggested, since it's a named division and someone might look for the phrase. Certainly not justified as a separate article by our usual standards for academic institutions. Some day, if the Division itself wins an award, rather than individuals associated with it, there might possibly be a case. DGG ( talk ) 15:48, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- @DGG: fixed the bolding, but you might want to try your signature again. Ansh6 6 6 08:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. DGG ( talk ) 15:48, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.