Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DiversityCanada Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 05:22, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DiversityCanada Foundation[edit]

This organization appears to be new, and there does not seem to significant coverage of it by secondary sources at all. I can't find any evidence that this topic merits an article yet. Dominic·t 05:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I couldn't find any significant press coverage either and their amateurish webpage does not exactly make me confident in their notability. If we are at it, the related article Celia Sankar should also be deleted. Afroghost (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment: the Celia Sankar article requires a separate AfD listing in my opinion. Ottre 06:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Nominated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celia Sankar Afroghost (talk) 21:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- fr33k man -s- 15:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- fr33k man -s- 15:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree, I think someone was too quick to create a page here that could not be sourced. If it becomes notable later, then it can be re-created. Cazort (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The foundation is quite notable; CBC radio has given 2 interviews with them that I listened to over the last year. The website is amateurish as are most under funded foundation websites. They are not Internet savvy but their work in bringing awareness to minority immigrants is! Mkevlar (talk) 14:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 15:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.