Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diurnum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Sext. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diurnum[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This will do better as a dictionary definition at Wiktionary than a permanent stub with no citations here. An online search reveals this topic does not have enough in-depth coverage to warrant a Wikipedia page. Bremps... 23:53, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTDICT. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
merge to sext, which it's just another name for. Mangoe (talk) 04:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to sext or Daily Office (Anglican). The term only really comes up in in the context of two breviaries used by a couple minor religious orders in the US Episcopal Church. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to sext as it is dealt with more fully there, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.