Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distributed Systems Technology Centre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Daniel (talk) 11:33, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Distributed Systems Technology Centre[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion of defunct non-notable organization; at minimum, upmerge with Cooperative Research Centre. fgnievinski (talk) 04:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, or alternatively Merge or redirect to Cooperative Research Centre. This is an obvious alternative to deletion, I'm not sure why this had to come to AfD. Deus et lex (talk) 04:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I am comfortable with keeping if that is the consensus, my comment above was that there is no reason why deletion is the only appropriate option. Deus et lex (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don’t really see any good rationale for deletion. How is a national research centre in such a key area not notable? Mccapra (talk) 07:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like some discussion about why this should not be kept.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in line with Mccapras comments above JW 1961 Talk 14:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I endorse the comments by Mccapras. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:31, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.