Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distant healing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete all three. Two by Gazimoff and one by PeterSymonds.Synergy 11:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Distant healing[edit]
- Distant healing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced fringe theory essay presented as fact. Fails WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR etc. Sandstein 10:41, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(ec with Blowdart below) Also nominating for the same reasons by the same author:
- Remedy for mental stress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Heal distant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sandstein 10:44, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd go further, the author is creating the same article under numerous titles, with a link to a web site. It's spam in my eyes. --Blowdart | talk 10:43, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.