Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dist Architects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 18:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dist Architects[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I find no matches in GNews or GBooks for this company and being co-based in London I would expect to find some English language matches as well as Turkish ones. There are two awards mentioned but no claim that they won either (I note that neither award has a Wikipedia article). This appears to fail to meet the WP:ORG criteria. Fæ (talk) 22:47, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 22:48, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 22:48, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Would be a speedy but for the claims to two awards. As neither of these awards are verified, let alone shown to be of significance, this leaves the article with zero claim to notability. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 23:31, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. This "article" says they were runners up in the 2006 award. Note that the site looks to be one that rehashes press releases given this link. -- Whpq (talk) 17:09, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:43, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.