Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dispute pyramid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Dispute pyramid

Dispute pyramid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very obscure article. WP:INDISCRIMINATE Garydh (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

• Keep Obscure , maybe, but not covered by WP:INDISCRIMINATE that I can see. About a hundred hits on Google Books and the same number of Scholar make it clear that this is a notable concept in employment law. Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 18:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
• Keep Appears to be a notable term in academic use. But either the author is not fully in command of the topic or they based it on a source which itself lacks appropriate academic rigour. Given the attention which seems to be given to the topic in US law schools I suspect the former. Not only is the article badly set out, there are a multitude of reason why grievances which might be litigated fail to get to court. Settlement is only one. It needs a rewrite by somebody who can identify the appropriate sources and explain it properly, but I don't think it is so far off the mark that it should just be deleted. The next attempt might be even worse (sigh). AJHingston (talk) 18:46, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

• Keep "Obscure" is not a strong reason for deletion. Collect (talk) 12:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.