Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DisneyMania Presents: WOW! Christmas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 22:22, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DisneyMania Presents: WOW! Christmas[edit]
- DisneyMania Presents: WOW! Christmas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Cry No More (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Wish Come True (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Unicorn School: First-Class Friends (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
More crystalballery in this long-running sequence AndrewHowse (talk) 13:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I think these articles should begin to be speedied on sight and the account blocked. This hoaxer is getting weaker with each new creation (WOW! and Disneymania? They're kidding, right?). Nate • (chatter) 06:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I would if I could find a legit clause: A9 doesn't apply here, I don't think. --AndrewHowse (talk) 20:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all: insufficient 3rd party verification, WP:CRYSTAL. JamesBurns (talk) 07:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Crystal balling goes a long way. And by a long way, I mean they really go into the future with these articles with no sign of notability or verifiable content. DiverseMentality 21:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:24, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and indef-block the creator: Appears to be another hoax in a series of hoax articles by an editor that only creates hoax articles. Complete waste of everyone's time.—Kww(talk) 17:53, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.