Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discos Fuentes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator, without dissention. Serpent's Choice (talk) 17:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discos Fuentes[edit]

Contested PROD, about a Colombian record label. No assertion of notability, completely fails WP:V and WP:RS due to a lack of independent sources other than its official website. Mr Senseless (talk) 05:33, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Well sourced now. I submitted this to AfD as after the PROD was removed it wasn't edited at all for the majority of the day. A {{unsourced}} tag would have been much more appropriate. I'm well aware that AfD is not cleanup (and that's the last time I submit an AfD when I'm tired and aren't feeling like running on the fly research), and I apologize for wasting your time on this one. Mr Senseless (talk) 14:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, seems to have quite the history. Plenty of Google News results. This and this seem like good sources too; many of them assert notability in many ways. I'd add them, but I'm about to go to bed. Good night, Wikipedia. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 05:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Even a cursory Google search demonstrates clear notability.--Michig (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Asserts historical importantance. Mostlyharmless (talk) 09:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.