Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dischan Media

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dischan Media[edit]

Dischan Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any reliable mentions of Dischan Media as a notable company. All of the sources are related to their game, Juniper's Knot, which makes sense to have its own page. However, it doesn't make sense to have this one, where all the sources are from the studio's own website, making it a case of self promotion. The studio itself isn't notable, and has shut down so it's unlikely to become more notable in the future. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 09:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 09:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Reference check done. Exhaustively and painstakingly referenced to ... their own website and YouTube channel. There's a few independent reviews on blog level, most of which are dead links - David Gerard (talk) 10:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as this also hints at G11, the sourcing and information are not amounting to how and where this company is specifically independently notable. SwisterTwister talk 19:50, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as WP:PROMO and unreliably sourced. No indications of notability nor significant RS to meet GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:09, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.