Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disablement Association of Hillingdon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disablement Association of Hillingdon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. very little third party coverage [1]. LibStar (talk) 00:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete essentially per the nominator. Articles need good coverage in reliable third-party sources. This one fails.--Prodigy96 (talk) 00:24, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Prodigy96. This article's only sources are "DASH" sources. Third-party coverage from reliable sources is needed for any article worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia. Because of this, (or lack thereof for this article) it does not satisfy the criteria for inclusion and therefore brings me to !vote delete.--^Trust_Me^THROW! 00:47, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trusted Throw and Prodigy96 confirmed socks of AtlanticDeep see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/AtlanticDeep. Codf1977 (talk) 06:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Codf1977 (talk) 11:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom Codf1977 (talk) 11:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @099 · 01:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete organisation of purely local scope. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this organization. Joe Chill (talk) 20:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.