Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disability and religion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Article desperately needs an overhaul but I don't see any consensus here that the topic isn't viable. Low participation levels so WP:NPASR. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disability and religion[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Content presented here doesn't require own article. Very brief, confusing article with no clear scope. Unencyclopedic. Also fails WP:PN RoCo^(talk) 06:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:25, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete without prejudice to recreation - There's no distinct subject being presented here, so it's hard to evaluate notability based simply on the article title. It begins "Topics on religion and disability..." and mentions what some dissertations talk about, whereas the page would need to be about "religion and disability", citing dissertations (or, preferably, published works) to support a summary of the topic. If executed well, this can be a distinction without a difference, indeed, but here I just don't see anything workable. No prejudice against speedy recreation, however, as it's possible (even probable) that the title could be a viable topic. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Disability is a topic of frequent discussion in many religions. Therefore the article could easily be expanded. The terms "disability" with "religion" gets 335,000 hits on google books. 88.104.33.40 (talk) 04:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I think this page is a notable topic anologous to disability and poverty and disability and sexuality. 2.101.52.59 (talk) 07:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Right now the page almost completely consists of patent nonsense and I don't see it developing into a concise article. RoCo^(talk) 07:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.