Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirty Nine Square

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 22:04, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dirty Nine Square[edit]

Wikipedia is not for things made up at camp. While this game may have a history at a particular camp, the article does not demonstrate that it is a widespread, well-known variant of four square. Further, it provides no independent sources. Accordingly, it fails the notability and verifiability guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 16:08, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. - and also, Wikipedia is not a game rulebook. JohnCD (talk) 16:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, everything that needs to be said has been said by C.Fred and JohnCD. --Stormie (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: copyright infringement. The text of the article was found to be a duplicate copy of http://www.westminsterwoods.org/DirtyNineComplete.htm. I have reverted back to the last version I found before addition of the infringing text (I think; I haven't fully vetted the history section, and I don't have time to right now). —C.Fred (talk) 11:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while the article is no longer a game guide, it provides no evidence of notability --T-rex 01:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.