Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direction (geometry)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Direction. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Direction (geometry)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article contains almost no encyclopedic content (and what there is, is duplicated in other articles), and most of it is written like a personal reflection. I don't think there's anything to salvage here. Deacon Vorbis (talk) 21:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Deacon Vorbis (talk) 00:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Direction has multiple mathematics pages that cover this topic. Power~enwiki (talk) 18:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Power~enwiki. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 20:02, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to Direction: nothing worth keeping but anyone ending up there for whatever reason will be best served by the DAB page.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 09:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Right, good point. --Deacon Vorbis (talk) 12:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.