Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dippak Gupta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BigDom 14:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dippak Gupta[edit]
- Dippak Gupta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject is a chartered accountant who seems to have done very well in his professional examinations, but there are no sources in the article, or that I can find otherwise, indicating that he meets our inclusion guidelines. Phil Bridger (talk) 00:55, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE - the subject doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 00:56, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The article reads like the resume of an accomplished accountant, without any strongly stated claim for notability. I cand find no coverage about this individual -- Whpq (talk) 15:37, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:BIO. Page reads like a resume.--Sodabottle (talk) 07:03, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.