Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinosaur Hour
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Yasht101 11:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dinosaur Hour[edit]
- Dinosaur Hour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing indicating it's notable. JoelWhy (talk) 17:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per About.com, Blogcritics, Midwest Book Review, and Kidsreads. SL93 (talk) 20:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Also, JoelWhy, please refer to WP:JNN and WP:BEFORE before nominating an article for deletion that is less than half an hour old. 192.251.134.5 (talk) 13:14, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yea, sorry about that. I somehow missed the page had just been created.JoelWhy (talk) 13:44, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:UGLY, while lacking now, with the sources found the article can be cleaned up. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep There are only a few reliable sources I could find but those should be enough to establish notability. But the article needs to be cleaned up and expanded, and more sources should be found. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.