Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimsum (Over-the-top)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dimsum (Over-the-top)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable VOD service. Would speedy A7 but don't think it complies with criteria. Nördic Nightfury 13:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 13:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 13:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 13:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brunei-related deletion discussions. Nördic Nightfury 13:13, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

this is a new VOD service in malaysia. still relatively less on info but worth to keep note underground work
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Underground work (talk • contribs) 04:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Underground work's comment says it all: "this is a new VOD service in malaysia. still relatively less on info". Simply put, the company lacks coverage in reliable sources, which isn't surprising given how young the company is. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Narutolovehinata5, could you sign your comment, please. Nördic Nightfury 07:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, sorry about that, I forgot to sign that. I try to avoid not signing my comment but occassionally I mess up. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting - low participation in seven days Nördic Nightfury 07:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nördic Nightfury 07:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: corporate spam on an unremarkable service; no value to the project and WP:PROMO applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 10:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.