Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digraj Singh Shahpura

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that though some sources need removal/cleanup, there is sufficient SIGCOV from acceptable sources to demonstrate notability Nosebagbear (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Digraj Singh Shahpura[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't establish notability,not independently notable outside of his company, no significant discussion of the subject in multiple reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 06:59, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There appears to be enough coverage to meet WP:SIGCOV from the sources already cited in the article.4meter4 (talk) 20:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is an awful lot of puffery here but WP:NOTCLEANUP applies. There are sources that are of borderline reliability, but there is enough to endorse WP:SIGCOV. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:35, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Per a source review and source searches, the subject meets WP:BASIC, although on a bit of a weaker level of the spectrum. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.