Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digitally enhanced board games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Board game. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Digitally enhanced board games[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism: the references don't seem to prove that this is a notable or widely-used term, at least not enough to avoid WP:NOTDICT AndrewWTaylor (talk) 14:53, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (untagged comment flagged as a keep by nominator) There's a lot of sources for this (google it, there's tons of articles that use the term), but more specifically that's what gamers are using. It is important to note that this represents a concept within the board games that is expanding really fast. Most companies are trying to make digitally enhanced games. smonniere (talk) 15:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I did google this and it is a neologism. The first line in the article says "Digitally enhanced board games are physical board games that use technology to enhance their gameplay". For me that's like saying "Digitally enhanced novels are physical novels that use technology to enhance their readability". It's not encyclopedic. - Pmedema (talk) 18:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. 71.237.195.240 05:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Board game - there's no real sources for this, but I think it's a reasonable search term. Ansh6 6 6 05:44, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.