Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital sheet music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to sheet music. seresin ( ¡? ) 07:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Digital sheet music[edit]

I have some severe doubts as to whether this can be written in a way that's separate from Sheet music itself, and doesn't use original research to explain why this is so revolutionary. On the other hand, consumer-level Word Processing was a big step up from typing... weak delete, convince me otherwise. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Created by single-purpose advertising account. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Sheet Music. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nuetral I'm not sure either. This article has always had major issues, but I do think as a /concpet/ it's worthwhile (just like word processing is a notable concept); it should, however, be rewritten to much a bit more neutral, yes. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 14:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep could be cleaned up. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 20:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not sure if the concept is notable or not; at any rate, the article would have to be rewritten from scratch: not only is it unencyclopedic in style (reads like an editorial) and completely unsourced, but also there is almost no actual information relevant to the topic. Most of the article consists of trivial statements and/or statements that are true for digital files in general, and not specific to digital sheet music. --Keelburg (talk) 15:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and perhaps clean up. It is an interesting and widely used way to distribute music - why not to have an article? Ioannes Pragensis (talk) 15:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rewrite or merge and redirect to Sheet music. Concept sounds slightly notable to me, but the article I'm not so sure about. Basic facts and reliable stuff should be kept, either on Digital sheet music or Sheet music. Rdbrewster ♪♫♪ 15:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and clean up. It's notable enough. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 15:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the concept is notable on its own --T-rex 20:16, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.