Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DigitalChalk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DigitalChalk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a piece of web software that fails WP:N and WP:WEB as it hasn't received significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources, nor has it made a significant impact in its particular industry. The article has been puffed up with numerous references to paid articles, press releases, and mentions in run-of-the-mill internet articles, but I wasn't able to find any sort of in-depth, significant coverage to indicate notability as per our relevant guidelines. Note that the author and sole contributor has a history of creating promotional articles. Them From Space 16:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom and salt. Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD without improvement. Independent sources are not optional. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.