Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Nájera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that this player does not meet the football notability guideline. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  13:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Nájera[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator based on a claim that the Andorran top flight is fully pro. This claim is unsupported and contradicted by sources at WP:FPL. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:47, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:47, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:47, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. I'm not sure about this one. UEFA's article about Andorra's league implies that it is professional without saying one way or the other outright. Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues currently lists Andorra's Primera Diviso as not fully professional. If the league is fully professional, then this guy meets the bar of WP:NSOCCER. If not, he doesn't. Hopefully someone can come up with a definitive, but at the moment I lean towards WikiProject Football's assessment. A Train^talk 20:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for a hand. A Train^talk 20:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's not a fully professional league. Number 5 7 21:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails subject specific guidelines, specifically WP:NFOOTBALL having not played at professional or international level. Coverage is WP:ROUTINE and per WP:ANYBIO does not indicate he has made widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record of football. Unless of course he has given up Football, moved to California and started skateboarding...but that seems to be someone else. ClubOranje^T 05:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 17:32, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 08:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.