Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Didlr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Didlr[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable social network, with no reliable sources. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 13:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence of notability fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:37, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NativeForeigner ^Talk 21:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now - A News search found some results and a wider search found basically the same results so there are links from notable websites but the information is not significant or notable. Other searches including Books (one result for building your own hair salon) found nothing else. SwisterTwister talk 19:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article was created by an account which now has a total editcount of three (3). Despite the references which have since been added, the article's creator clearly paid little attention to WP:42. Promotional content is forbidden on Wikipedia. Please delete per the others and per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:29, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.