Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dictionary of Occult, Hermetic and Alchemical Sigils

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 00:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionary of Occult, Hermetic and Alchemical Sigils[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Book with no independent reliable sources and no indication of any other notability. —C.Fred (talk) 21:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

keep The Walter Pagel reference is an independent reliable sources. There is also another review by RP Multhauf in Speculum; Volume 58 Issue 01 page 261-262; so I think this passes notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - WP:BOOKCRIT - Meets criteria 1 of WP:BOOKCRIT since it has been the subject of at least 3 independent non-trivial published works. Two reviews in The British Journal for the History of Science and one in Speculum. -- Taketa (talk) 08:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.