Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dickshooter, Idaho

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. clpo13_(talk) 22:51, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dickshooter, Idaho[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's got quite the colorful name, but there doesn't seem to be anything here that meets WP:GEOLAND/WP:GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 04:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 04:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 04:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even aside from the silly name list articles, there is a fair amount of coverage of this location. Unfortunately lots of the sources in the article are now deadlinks. Sources I found with a quick 2 minute Google and I'm sure there are more: [1], [2], [3] [4]. There is probably a case for WP:GNG just on the funny name stuff alone like [5]. Vladimir.copic (talk) 06:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Dickshooter Ridge. Does not appear to be a community. The ridge/wilderness area does appear to be notable, so an article can be spun off on that. The creek may also be notable. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 21:50, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; Unfortunately, the town did exist...and is still on maps. WP:GNG only for the name... The local news link above, does give quite a history. - Mjquinn_id (talk) 18:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but like the weakest keep possible - There's this book which is just about WP:SIGCOV and the news article linked above. FOARP (talk) 20:28, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.