Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Hoven
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:40, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Dick Hoven[edit]
- Dick Hoven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is an unsourced BLP that I suspect to be a hoax. If it is not a hoax, the person certainly fails notability tests. It had a prod tag on it, which was removed despite the PROD template's statement that says the articles needed "at least one reference to a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article." The sources in the article failed this basic test. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NACTOR as he has only had minor roles Seasider91 (talk) 18:08, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as unprodder. Even if he does exist, and managed and produced Baha Men (something that I agree is inadequately sourced) WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:BIO1E would still apply. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable actor and music producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.