Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diary Of A Wimpy Kid: The Worst Summer Ever

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Quarl ^(talk) 15:47, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diary Of A Wimpy Kid: The Worst Summer Ever[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Book will be released next year; too far in the future, violates WP:CRYSTAL. Derild 49 21 ☼ 20:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Da'Fuck? Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 21:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as blatant hoax. There may not even be a 6th book in the series and even if there is there is no reason to assume that it will have this title or follow this plot. As soon as a new Wimpy Kid book comes out we get a slew of idiotic articles created with speculative titles and content concerning the next book. It always turns out to be pure bullshit. The real plots are never revealed in advance but people just make the stuff up. We must have deleted at least half a dozen pointless hoax articles about alleged titles and plots for the fifth book before the real title was revealed. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:55, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 100% a hoax. The 6th book is "A New Life". It comes out next year. Silver seren^C 22:17, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reference for that? I suspect that you will find that "A New Life" is actually a just variant of "My New Life", which was one of the most persistent hoax titles suggested for book 5, and hence either yet another hoax or maybe a misunderstanding born of the confusion created by previous hoaxes. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:35, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, no, it's just what I heard. But I am fairly certain that this article will not be the title. And, even if it is, there are no reliable sources available to prove it (or even unreliable ones), so we should delete regardless. Silver seren^C 04:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per WP:CSD G3. Pure nonsense. -68.219.240.190 (talk) 13:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.