Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diaosi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 09:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diaosi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability except passing internet references ProgrammingGeek (Page! • Talk! • Contribs!) 01:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the nominator probably did not notice the first AfD two years ago, which was closed as Speedy Keep. -Zanhe (talk) 12:55, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The references already in the article are quite good and a Google News search produces plenty of significant coverage in reliable sources showing that this Chinese slang word describes a real social group and therefore the topic is notable. An example is this 2015 article called 'Diaosi' - the generation of losers building China's counter-culture. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:55, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. The term meets WP:GNG from English-language sources alone. Daß Wölf 02:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Zanhe. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.