Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dianna Cohen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dianna Cohen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP1E-ish. The org may not be notable (I haven't yet checked) but I can barely find any mentions of Cohen in the context of the organisation, let alone mentions that'd satisfy GNG. -- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 22:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 22:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 22:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Plastic Pollution Coalition, the notability, if any, lies there. Geschichte (talk) 22:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: I don't have any vote on the issue, but wanted to make clear that I believe that she is the co-founder and CEO of the Plastic Pollution Coalition. I don't know the notability rules on founders and CEOs so I will defer to others. Link Remember (talk) 17:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:GNG applies, same as with any article. -- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 19:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Commet I am not sure I see clear notability here; while an important genre (environment), how is this particular organization different and more noteworthy than the other thousands of environmental organizations? The citations seem to just be evidence of it's existence and the work they do, but it doesn't seem that they've done anything particularly significant. Does just being part of an important movement make an organization significant? Star7924 (talk) 23:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The organization is not up for debate here. But a debate on it may be started. Geschichte (talk) 21:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, she's not notable and what usable information is in the article is already present in Plastic Pollution Coalition anyways. IHateAccounts (talk) 18:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She meets GNG. Inexplicably, references from the New York Times [1], the Atlantic [2], and NBC News [3] were not used in this article. JSFarman (talk) 02:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This Rolling Stone article also provides extensive coverage specifically about Cohen.[4] JSFarman (talk) 22:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:09, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the sources identified by JSFarman. Also, the U.S. State Department organized an exhibit of her work at the embassy in Poland, according to this coverage. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:30, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I vote to KEEP Dianna is on the forefront of the Climate Change solution and Last week Dianna Cohen lead a Press Conference on the Plastic Free Presidency . Jgorman60 (talk) 21:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If the article is kept, then it will need a bit of rev/deletion. WP:COI account Jgorman60 (talk · contribs) has added promotional and copyright violation content multiple times. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per JSFarman's sourcing. Please improve and if there are further issues, we can proceed accordingly. Missvain (talk) 01:38, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.