Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamonds Are Forever (Funky Diamonds album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Funky Diamonds. If sources are found, more content is added and consensus can be reached, a new article on the album can be created. Krakatoa Katie 07:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diamonds Are Forever (Funky Diamonds album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album. Group's notability is in question as well. Has not charted, it little more than a tracklisting, fails WP:NALBUMS. Unlikely to ever be expanded. Fixer23 (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:27, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Funky Diamonds are probably notable, in that they were signed to a major label, and their article isn't currently at AfD. Per WP:NALBUM, the released albums of a notable band are generally notable, and the article is certainly more detailed than merely a track listing. I'm unable to immediately find any English language reviews but that's unsurprising as the album was apparently only released in Germany and Japan; it would beggar belief that there are absolutely no reliable sources in existence for a second album of a band signed to Sony BMG. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:56, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's grounds for keep of the musical group, not an album. The only notable information here (on one member leaving, unsourced by the way) can easily be merged into the artist article, the rest of the information is on differences in album cover art.Fixer23 (talk) 07:33, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.