Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond on a Landmine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Billy Talent III. Wily D 11:45, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Diamond on a Landmine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet WP:NSONG, I'm seeing zero reliable sources covering this song, and the bulk of the content is clearly original research. It apparently peaked at #88 on Canadian Hot 100 (though the citation for this doesn't support it). That doesn't seem enough to establish notability. 0x0077BE [^talk/_contrib] 04:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Billy Talent III, the song's parent album. At the least, the song title is a plausible search term. I'm not seeing much in terms of coverage, though (this is the most I could find), and the chart position alone is not enough to convince me that a standalone article is warranted. Gong show 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.