Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dialectical libertarianism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 23:24, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dialectical libertarianism[edit]

delete. neologism, not notable, stub at best. does not establish notability. Buridan (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. —Buridan (talk) 10:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I find one book that includes this phrase in its subtitle, and a bunch of book reviews of this one book, but no relevant sourcing. I don't think this can at this time rise beyond the obvious dictionary definition that it is today. GRBerry 15:29, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Any info belongs in the article about the author Chris Matthew Sciabarra. Carol Moore 02:17, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Carolmooredc {talk}
Comment You have to admit, the name does sound cool, and helps create the impression that libertarianism is so important, that we have all kinds of philosophical branches and nuances, just like the other major schools of thinking. Thus, I find it hard to vote delete, for reasons of WP:ILIKEIT if nothing else. EVCM (talk) 16:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.