Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diagnosis... DON'T! reCoRdings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Diagnosis... DON'T! reCoRdings[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. nothing in gnews. [1]. too minor to merit an article. LibStar (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:56, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable music label. Of the artists mentioned in the article, only Marissa Nadler seems particularly notable, and this label has only produced a single album of hers (an Australian concert compilation). -- Lear's Fool 12:53, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.