Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhruva College of Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dhruva College of Management[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indications of meeting WP:GNG. Article is promotional and entirely self-sourced. Recommend redirection to Education in Hyderabad. Orville^talk 15:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Orville^talk 15:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Orville^talk 15:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Orville^talk 15:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as an accredited post-graduate institute. It certainly needs cleaning up and sourcing but it is not as irredeemable as the over-tagging would imply. Indian institutions put far less on the Internet than western schools so we should avoid systemic bias by giving time for expansion and for local sources to be found and added. Experience shows that with proper research WP:ORG can be met. Just Chilling (talk) 17:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - WP:NOTCLEANUP but some of the issues have already been addressed since nomination. ~Kvng (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Clearly there are issues with the article, however, this is a tertiary institution of instruction which we have, through previous consensus, determined are almost always inherently notable subject only to verification it isn't a WP:HOAX. Despite how poorly referenced this article is, I feel safe in saying this isn't a hoax. Chetsford (talk) 22:50, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.